Don't call it a comeback . . . .
Folks around the blogosphere are "celebrating" the anniversary of history's most ludicrous photo op. I don't really have anything to add. But I think that it's strange that the prez decided to veto the supplemental today, of all days. I mean, he had ten days. Did he want the symbolism? Why?
posted by Number Three @ 6:59 PM
The views expressed in posts on this weblog represent those of the individual blogger writing the post in question, and are not those of any other person, living or dead or undead, real or imaginary, friendly or hostile, fictional or non-fictional, historic or jejune, natural or artificial, in whatever form of business association, or any government agency or official. Also, not the views of George S. Patton either (apparently, he transcended the preceding categories). Freedom from Blog is a free speech zone. Have fun with it, while it lasts. But try to keep it (relatively) clean, people.
Freedom from Blog is home to Number Three, who is not a Cylon but would like to be, and the tenacious one, TenaciousMcD, who may be a Cylon.
1 Comments:
I could be wrong, but my understanding is that the Dems held onto the bill for a few days so that they could send it to the White House on the anniversary. The timing was their plan from the get-go, and Bush played along because he wanted to say he vetoed the bill immediately upon its receipt.
Post a Comment
<< Home