Don't call it a comeback . . . .
Isn't the Mitchell Report pretty anti-climactic? I mean, Bonds, Clemens, blah blah blah.
posted by Number Three @ 6:15 AM
The views expressed in posts on this weblog represent those of the individual blogger writing the post in question, and are not those of any other person, living or dead or undead, real or imaginary, friendly or hostile, fictional or non-fictional, historic or jejune, natural or artificial, in whatever form of business association, or any government agency or official. Also, not the views of George S. Patton either (apparently, he transcended the preceding categories). Freedom from Blog is a free speech zone. Have fun with it, while it lasts. But try to keep it (relatively) clean, people.
Freedom from Blog is home to Number Three, who is not a Cylon but would like to be, and the tenacious one, TenaciousMcD, who may be a Cylon.
1 Comments:
I think you underestimate the impact. So YOU knew that Rocket Roger was juiced, and I probably knew it too (although, to be honest, I was never completely sure about it), but a lot of people didn't. And the volume of names is itself significant. It's the first time, outside of Caminiti's or Canseco's remarks, that we've had evidence of systematic abuse.
Plus, the evidence is weighted against certain teams and markets: NY, LA, SF, Boston. But those are such major markets that this will be a big media story for a long time, especially when you figure it in to the legacy of the Yankees. (I'd mention Baltimore too, since they're a huge offender as well, but then again they also suck.)
OK, so what really good teams of the last 15 years have escaped relatively clean? Aside from David Justice, I haven't heard much about the Braves & roids this week (and even Justice may have been post-Brave).
Post a Comment
<< Home